Legal Opinion
Holly v. Anton
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided January 22, 2004No. 03-1653PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
Christopher Holly, an Illinois inmate confined at the Danville Correctional Center, filed a complaint in the Northern District of Illinois under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 alleging that Michael Anton, a detective with the sheriffs office in Cook County, Illinois, entered his home in Indiana without a warrant and confiscated his computer in violation of his federally guaranteed rights to due process and privacy. The district court dismissed the complaint sua sponte under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) for failure to state a claim after concluding that the suit is time-barred. We affirm.
In his complaint,…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Hudson v. PalmerSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Wilson v. GarciaSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- James T. Donald v. Cook County Sheriff's DepartmentCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1996
- Shaun R. Johnson v. Officer Ruben Rivera, Officer Matthew Martinez, Officer Geoffrey Howard, and Officer William PellegriniCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2001
- Quentin Kelly, Jerry Smith, Ray B. Hill v. City of Chicago, an Illinois Municipal Corporation, Michael Collins, Gene DembowskiCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1993
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Christopher Holly v. Wexford Health Services, IncorCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2009
- Joseph v. KimpleDistrict Court, S.D. Georgia · 2004
- Holly v. AntonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Rodgers v. TitusDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 2019
- Roldan v. CiceroDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2019