Ms. K Ex Rel. S.B. v. City of South Portland
District Court, D. Maine
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER ON DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
SINGAD, Chief Judge.
Before the Court is Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment (Docket #27). Through this motion, Defendants seek summary judgment on ten counts of Plaintiffs eleven-count Amended Complaint (Docket # 17). 1 For the reasons laid out below, the Court GRANTS Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment.
I. STANDARD OF REVIEW
Summary judgment is appropriate “if the pleadings, depositions, answers to interrogatories, and admissions on file, together with the affidavits, if any, show that there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- City of Canton v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Personnel Administrator of Mass. v. FeeneySupreme Court of the United States · 1979
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Van Duyn Ex Rel. Van Duyn v. Baker School District 5JCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
- John A. Ex Rel. A.A. v. Board of EducationCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2007
- James N. Van Duyn, for His Son, Christopher J. Van Duyn, a Minor & Incapacitated Person v. Baker School District 5jCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
- Millay Ex Rel. YRM v. Surry School DepartmentDistrict Court, D. Maine · 2008
- SH v. Campbell County School DistrictWyoming Supreme Court · 2018
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.