Legal Opinion

Smith v. Waite

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided January 11, 1968No. 4653PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

McDONALD, Chief Justice.

This is an appeal by plaintiff from summary judgment that plaintiff take nothing in a suit for breach of contract based on a written franchise agreement.

The record on summary judgment reflects that plaintiff Smith operates “Smitty’s Pancake House” in Seattle, Washington, and entered into a franchise agreement with defendant Waite whereby plaintiff granted defendant the right to operate in Waco as “Smitty’s Pancake House.” Such agreement prescribed the design and fixtures of the operation; provided Waite should use ingredients as specified by Smith’s formula; and…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Buchanan v. JeanTexas Supreme Court · 1943
  2. Coca-Cola Co. v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1920
  3. Shaddock v. Grapette Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1953

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Phillips v. PhillipsTexas Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Young v. J. F. Zimmerman & Sons, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1968
  3. LoBue v. United Services Planning AssociationCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1971
  4. Grant v. Sherwood Shores, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1972
  5. Phillips v. PhillipsTexas Supreme Court · 1992

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API