Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

State v. Myers

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided June 7, 2001No. C7-00-1134PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

PAUL H. ANDERSON, Justice.

Appellant Daniel Glen Myers asks us to determine whether the district court abused its discretion when it sentenced him to a consecutive sentence. Myers pleaded guilty to one felony count of obstructing legal process under Minn.Stat. § 609.50, subds. 1(2) and 2(1) (2000), and one misdemeanor count of driving under the influence of alcohol. He also pleaded guilty to an unrelated felony theft count. On the obstructing legal process count, the Ramsey County District Court imposed a sentence of imprisonment for a term of 1 year and 1 day to be served consecutively…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State v. FordSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1995
  2. State v. HoughSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1998
  3. State v. NunnSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
  4. State v. WarrenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1999
  5. State v. NotchSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1989

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. State v. LeakeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2005
  2. State v. SkipinthedaySupreme Court of Minnesota · 2006
  3. State v. ZaisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2011
  4. State v. SpenceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2009
  5. People v. PoindexterColorado Court of Appeals · 2013

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API