Legal Opinion

Lansky v. Prettyman

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided May 12, 1905No. Docket No. 97PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Error to Washtenaw; Kinne, J. Case by William Lansky against Horace G. Prettyman for an assault and battery, false imprisonment, and malicious prosecution. There was judgment for defendant, and plaintiff brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtBlair, J.

The plaintiff commenced suit against the defendant in the Washtenaw circuit court by filing a declaration alleging, as the basis of recovery, assault and battery, false imprisonment, and malicious prosecution. The defendant at the time of the occurrences which gave rise to the action was engaged in conducting a boarding house at Ann Arbor, and had in his employ a man by the name of Van Kaul. Shortly prior to the arrest of plaintiff, defendant missed certain provisions, which the cook told him had been stolen by Van Kaul, and that Van Kaul had endeavored to induce him (the cook) to assist him…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Whitfield v. WestbrookMississippi Supreme Court · 1866
  2. Webster v. FowlerMichigan Supreme Court · 1891
  3. Govaski v. DowneyMichigan Supreme Court · 1894
  4. Thompson v. PriceMichigan Supreme Court · 1894

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Gordon v. MountCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
  2. De Boer v. AdamsMichigan Supreme Court · 1910

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API