Legal Opinion

Moore v. Diaz

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided September 16, 1993No. 429PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

ROWLEY, President Judge:

Contending that his appointed position as Assistant Jury Commissioner was eliminated by the appellee, Judge Diaz, who lacked the authority to take such action, Richard B. Moore, (hereinafter “appellant”) appeals from the trial court’s adjudication in equity in favor of Judge Diaz1, and Matthew F. Lewandowski2, (hereinafter “appellees”). In order to dispose of this appeal, we must consider two interrelated questions raised by appellant, which are: (1) “whether the Jury Commission[ ] in Philadelphia [County] is part of the Court' of Common Pleas of Philadelphia…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Sweet v. Pennsylvania Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  2. Beckert v. WarrenSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  3. Village Beer & Beverage, Inc. v. Vernon D. Cox & Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  4. Schaeffer v. FreySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
  5. Schultz v. City of PhiladelphiaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1983

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Snyder v. GravellSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API