Legal Opinion

Greenwood v. Stewart

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided September 16, 1952No. 34232PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTownsend, J.

1. (a) The statutory or “Jack Jones” forms of pleading (Ga. L. 1847, p. 203 et seq.) were not repealed by the Practice and Pleading Act of 1893 (Code § 81-103), and the language used in the declarations therein for the recovery of real estate or personal property, “. . to which your petitioner claims title”, is a sufficient allegation of title in the plaintiff to support the action (Dugas v. Hammond, 130 Ga. 87, 60 S. E. 268) and “should be regarded as containing all the substantial and necessary averments of the common-law form for the same kind of action.” See also Breen v. Barfield, 80 Ga.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Dugas v. HammondSupreme Court of Georgia · 1908
  2. Breen v. BarfieldCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1949
  3. Crews v. RobersonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1940

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Forsyth v. Peoples, Inc. of RomeCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1966
  2. Capitol Enterprises, Inc. v. MooreCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1963
  3. Forsyth v. Peoples, Inc. of RomeCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1966

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API