Legal Opinion
Forsyth v. Peoples, Inc. of Rome
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Decided December 2, 1966No. 42150PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Franicum, Judge.
1. The petition, being in the Jack Jones form, was not subject to either general or special demurrer. Macon & W. R. Co. v. Meador Bros., 67 Ga. 672, 674; Breen v. Barfield, 80 Ga. App. 615 (56 SE2d 791); Greenwood v. Stewart, 86 Ga. App. 764 (1a) (72 SE2d 539). The court did not err in overruling the grounds of demurrer as complained of.
2. The trial court did not err in admitting in evidence plaintiff’s Exhibit 3, since the plaintiff’s witness, who testified that he was employed by the plaintiff finance company, was *727familiar with an account which the company had with a named…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Hobbs v. New England InsuranceSupreme Court of Georgia · 1956
- Jones v. Boyd Truck Lines, Inc.District Court, W.D. Missouri · 1951
- Breen v. BarfieldCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1949
- Dasher v. International Harvester Co. of AmericaCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1930
- Macon & Western Railroad v. Meador Bros.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1881
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Harper v. SamplesCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1982
- Bob Maddox Dodge, Inc. v. McKieCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1980
- A & D Barrel & Drum Co. v. FuquaCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1974
- Brooks v. ROLEY & ROLEY ENGINEERS, INC.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1977
- National Bank of Georgia v. HillCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1979
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.