Legal Opinion

Libertarian Party v. District of Columbia Board of Elections & Ethics

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided March 8, 2011No. Civil Action 09-1676 (BAH)PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

BERYL A. HOWELL, District Judge.

This case arises out of the November 4, 2008 election for President of the United States. The central issue is whether a District of Columbia election regulation governing the reporting of write-in votes unreasonably infringes upon Plaintiffs’ First Amendment speech and associational rights, as well as their rights to due process and equal protection under the law. Pursuant to a D.C. election regulation, Defendant District of Columbia Board of Elections and Ethics (the “Board”) is only required to tally and report the total number of write-in…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Buckley v. ValeoSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Flast v. CohenSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  3. Bolling v. SharpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
  4. Honig v. DoeSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  5. Dunn v. BlumsteinSupreme Court of the United States · 1972

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Field v. BowenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
  2. Libertarian Party v. District of Columbia Board of Elections & EthicsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2012
  3. Democratic Party of Virginia v. BrinkDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API