Legal Opinion

Libertarian Party v. District of Columbia Board of Elections & Ethics

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided June 8, 2012No. 19-1226PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion for the Court filed by Circuit Judge TATEL.

TATEL, Circuit Judge:

The District of Columbia’s Board of Elections and Ethics published the total number of write-in votes cast in the 2008 presidential election but, consistent with its regulations, never reported which individuals were penciled in by voters choosing the write-in option or how many votes any such individual accrued. The Libertarian Party, along with its 2008 presidential candidate Bob Barr, a write-in candidate, contends that the District’s failure to report the number of votes cast for Barr violates the First and Fifth…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Dunn v. BlumsteinSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Anderson v. CelebrezzeSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Williams v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  4. Burdick v. TakushiSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  5. Gray v. SandersSupreme Court of the United States · 1963

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Eugene Mazo v. New Jersey Secty StateCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2022
  2. League of United Latin American Citizens v. Executive Office of the PresidentDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2026
  3. Richardson v. TrumpDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2020
  4. Vote Forward v. DejoyDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API