Legal Opinion

Woodward v. Pressley

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided December 5, 1978No. 7830SC154PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MARTIN (Harry C.), Judge.

We hold the trial court erred in dismissing plaintiffs’ action. Plaintiffs’ evidence must be considered in the light most favorable to them. Scott v. Darden, 259 N.C. 167, 130 S.E. 2d 42 (1963). In passing on this assignment of error, evidence erroneously excluded is to be considered with other evidence offered by plaintiffs. Norburn v. Mackie, 262 N.C. 16, 136 S.E. 2d 279 (1964).

Plaintiffs must produce evidence tending to show all the essential elements of fraud.

While fraud has no all-embracing definition and is better left undefined lest crafty men find a way of…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Ragsdale v. KennedySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1974
  2. Whitehurst v. . Insurance Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1908
  3. Norburn v. MacKieSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1964
  4. Scott v. DardenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1963

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Freese v. SmithCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1993
  2. Vickery v. OLIN HILL CONST. CO., INC.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980
  3. Gvest Real Est., LLC v. JS Real Est. Invs., LLCSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API