Legal Opinion

Smith v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.

District Court, S.D. West Virginia

Decided September 6, 1995No. Civ. A. No. 1:95-0100PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM ORDER

FEINBERG, United States Magistrate Judge.

Defendants State Farm Fire and Casualty Company and State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company (“Defendants” or “State Farm”) have filed a Motion to Compel which presents important questions concerning Federal Civil Rule 26(a)(2)(B)’s requirements for disclosure of expert testimony. The parties have provided helpful memoran-da, setting forth their positions on the extent of disclosures required. The questions presented are these:

1. May expert witnesses adopt, as part of their respective reports, answers to interrogatories which…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Van Nguyen v. IBP, Inc.District Court, D. Kansas · 1995
  2. Ager v. Stormont-Vail HospitalCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1980

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Gene S. Jacobsen, and Cross-Appellee v. Deseret Book Company, a Utah Corporation Dean Hughes, AndCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2002
  2. Baker v. Chevron USA, Inc.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 2010
  3. Reed v. BinderDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1996
  4. Rambus, Inc. v. Infineon Technologies AGDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2001
  5. Nesvig v. NesvigNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2006

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API