Legal Opinion
King v. Tanner
New York Supreme Court
Decided August 9, 1989PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Gerard E. Delaney, J.
This is an application by plaintiffs (and defendant Matthew King Agency, Inc.), inter alia, to reargue and renew a previous *1074decision of this court entered on February 17, 1989 (King v Tanner, 142 Misc 2d 1004) which found that "the results of a DNA (deoxyribonucleic acid) test which indicate a probability of paternity of 99.993% are sufficient as a matter of law to warrant a summary judgment dismissing a cause of action by plaintiff for slander wherein the purported slander is alleged to be a statement by the defendant mother of a child, that plaintiff…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- People v. Wesley, New York County Courts1988
- Department of Social Services ex rel. Sandra C. v. Thomas J. S.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
- In re Baby Girl S.New York Surrogate's Court · 1988
- King v. TannerNew York Supreme Court · 1989
- Angela B. v. Glenn D.New York City Family Court · 1984
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Department of Social Services ex rel. Debra L. v. William J.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
- OCE Business Systems, Inc. v. J.I. Sopher & Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
- Gregory F. W. v. Lori Anne B.New York City Family Court · 1994
- A. T. v. M. K.New York City Family Court · 1989