Legal Opinion
Erickson Productions Inc v. Kraig R Kast
District Court, N.D. California
Decided February 10, 2022No. 4:13-cv-05472Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 ERICKSON PRODUCTIONS INC, et al., Case No. 13-cv-05472-DMR 8 Plaintiffs, ORDER AWARDING ATTORNEYS’ 9 v. FEES AND COSTS 10 KRAIG RUDINGER KAST, et al., Re: Dkt. No. 413 11 Defendants. 12 Plaintiffs Erickson Productions, Inc. (“Erickson Productions”) and Jim Erickson (together, 13 “Erickson”) filed a motion pursuant to the Copyright Act, 17 U.S.C. § 505, for an award of 14 attorneys’ fees and costs in this copyright infringement action. [Docket No. 382.] In a prior order, 15 the court granted Erickson’s fee motion in…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Blum v. StensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Camacho v. Bridgeport Financial, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- Moreno v. City of SacramentoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- Julie Chalmers v. City of Los Angeles, a Municipal CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.