Lazaris v. Metropolitan Property & Casualty Insurance
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
1Opinion of the Court
Wilkins, CJ.
It is an unfair settlement practice, and also an unfair or deceptive act or practice under G. L. c. 93A, § 9 (1), if an insurance company fails “to effectuate prompt, fair and equitable settlements of claims in which liability has become reasonably clear.” G. L. c. 176D, § 3 (9) (/). We are presented, for the first time, with the question whether an insurance company violates § 3 (9) (f) if it insists that a claimant against *503one of its insureds release all claims against its insured before it will pay a claim in which liability has become reasonably clear.1 We shall answer the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Clegg v. ButlerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1997
- Hartford Casualty Insurance v. New Hampshire InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1994
- MacInnis v. Aetna Life & Casualty Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1988
- Kapp v. Arbella Mutual InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1998
- Thaler v. THE AMERICAN INSURANCE CO.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1993
3Cited by25 opinions
- Hopkins v. Liberty Mutual InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2001
- Otis v. Arbella Mutual InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2005
- Bolden v. O'Connor Café of Worcester, Inc.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 2000
- Watters v. Guaranty National InsuranceMontana Supreme Court · 2000
- Davis v. Allstate InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2001
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.