Casa Loma Springs Development Co. v. Brevard County
Supreme Court of Florida
1Opinion of the Court
In condemnation proceedings it appears that the public road authorities had taken possession of the property in controversy for right of way purposes before the trial to determine compensation to be awarded. This was illegal. Spafford v. Brevard County, ___ Fla. ___, 110 So.2d Rep. 451. The Court charged the jury that the compensation should be "the fair, actual market value at the time of the lawful appropriation, that is, at the present time."
In Sunday v. Louisville N. R. Co., 62 Fla. 395, 57 South. Rep. 351, the trial to determine the compensation to be awarded was before the property was…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Seaboard Air Line Railway Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
- Brooks-Scanlon Corp. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
- Sunday v. Louisville & Nashville RailroadSupreme Court of Florida · 1911
3Cited by9 opinions
- Anhoco Corporation v. Dade CountySupreme Court of Florida · 1962
- DEPARTMENT OF TRANS. OF STATE OF FLA. v. NalvenSupreme Court of Florida · 1984
- State Road Department v. BenderSupreme Court of Florida · 1941
- Staninger v. Jacksonville Expressway AuthorityDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1966
- Rubano v. Department of Transp.Supreme Court of Florida · 1995
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.