Carroll v. State

KENNETH W. SHRUM, Judge.

Richard Carroll (“Movant”) appeals the denial (without an evidentiary hearing) of his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief. 1 Movant maintains that without an evidentiary hearing, there were no facts from which the court could determine if “appointed counsel had complied with Rule 24.035(e), or had instead abandoned [Mov-ant].” With that as his premise, Movant urges reversal and remand for an eviden-tiary hearing. This court affirms the judgment of the motion court.

Appellate review of the denial of a Rule 24.035 motion is limited to determining if the findings…