Legal Opinion
In re the Estate of Poulson
New York Surrogate's Court
Decided May 7, 1935PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Delehanty, S.
Decedent died intestate on April 6, 1931, while resident in New York county. Her distributees are twenty-five in number and are all descendants of brothers and sisters. Thirteen reside in Sweden, five in Utah, two in each of the States of California and New York, one in each of the States of Colorado and Missouri and one in Denmark. None of the distributees knew of decedents death for some weeks after it occurred and learned of it only after her effects were taken over by the public administrator of New York county.
When the accounting administratrix learned of decedent’s death…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Ormiston v. . OlcottNew York Court of Appeals · 1881
- In re the Accounting of McDowellNew York Surrogate's Court · 1918
- Matter of Denton v. . SanfordNew York Court of Appeals · 1886
- In re the Accounting & Settlement of the Accounts of McDowellAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1917
- Moore v. . EureSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1888
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- In re the Estate of ClarkNew York Surrogate's Court · 1938
- Junkersfeld v. Bank of Manhattan Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1937
- In re the Estate of SlensbyNew York Surrogate's Court · 1938
- In re the Accounting of FirthNew York Surrogate's Court · 1953
- In re GarfieldDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1937
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.