Legal Opinion

Smith v. State

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided June 28, 2000No. 49S00-9808-CR-465PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDickson, Justice

The defendant-appellant, Arthur Smith, was convicted of the August 8, 1997, murder 1 of Karlin Winters. We affirm, concluding that the trial court did not err in its refusal of tendered instructions regarding citizen’s arrest, its denial of a challenge for cause to a prospective juror, and its admission of a firearm into evidence.

Jury Instruction

The defendant claims that the trial court erred in refusing to give his tendered instructions regarding a citizen’s power of arrest and use of force. The defendant challenges the trial court’s refusal of two instructions, the defendant’s tendered…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Bieghler v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Joyner v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Timberlake v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1997
  4. Benefiel v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1999
  5. Wrinkles v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1997

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Gary Wayne Oswalt v. State of IndianaIndiana Supreme Court · 2014
  2. Kendall v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2003
  3. Patton v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2002
  4. Sharp v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2004
  5. Prewitt v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2007

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API