Legal Opinion

Rhoades

United States Court of Claims

Decided February 1, 1980No. 344-79CPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Pleading and practice; compulsory counterclaims; amendment of pleadings; timeliness. — On February 1, 1980 the court entered the following order:

*612Before Davis, Judge, Presiding, Kunzig and Bennett, Judges.

The issue in this case, before the court on plaintiffs motion to dismiss defendant’s counterclaim, involves the propriety and timeliness of that counterclaim. Because we find the counterclaim to have been filed in a timely manner within the procedures outlined by our rules, we hold for the Government.

Plaintiff filed the petition in this case on August 2, 1979, seeking wages he claims were…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. St. Louis-San Francisco Railway Co. v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1969
  2. Moore-McCormack Lines, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1966
  3. BlackburnUnited States Court of Claims · 1977

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Jana, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1995
  2. Lw Construction of Charleston, LLC v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2018
  3. Lw Construction of Charleston, LLC v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2018
  4. Square One Armoring Services Company v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API