Mauricio v. Bronnenberg
District Court, N.D. Indiana
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
ALLEN SHARP, Chief Judge.
On January 19,1984, Arnold Mauricio, an inmate incarcerated at the Indiana State Prison (hereafter ISP), filed this complaint pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Named as defendants are Robert Bronnenberg, Assistant Superintendent at the ISP, and Thomas Steepro, a Unit Team Manager at the ISP. Defendants have complied with the mandates of Lewis v. Faulkner, 689 F.2d 100 (7th Cir.1982).
Plaintiff's sole claim is that under Indiana law, Indiana Department of Correction (hereafter IDOC), and ISP written policy, rule and regulation, and established practice…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Daniels v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Parratt v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Cleveland Board of Education v. LoudermillSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Paul v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Hewitt v. HelmsSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Collins v. Manufacturers Hanover Trust Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1982
- Gorman v. MoodyDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 1989
- Hendrix v. EvansDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 1989
- Mauricio (Anrold, Jr.) v. Bronnenberg (Robert), Steepro (Thomas)Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1987