Legal Opinion

People v. Hartley

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided September 19, 1974No. 12138PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Trapp

Appellant, Holman, and one Hartley, were charged with conspiracy to commit armed robbery. Claiming privilege against self-incrimination Holman refused to testify for the prosecution at the trial of Hartley. The trial court adjudged Holman in contempt and sentenced him to 6 months in jail. He appeals.

At the time the claim of privilege was asserted and denied, Plolman had been convicted of the offenses charged upon a jury verdict. It was agreed that motions in arrest of judgment and for a new trial had been argued and were being held under advisement before another judge. It was also agreed…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Boykin v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. Malloy v. HoganSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  3. McCarthy v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  4. Hoffman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
  5. Reina v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. RodgersSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
  2. People Ex Rel. Kunce v. HoganAppellate Court of Illinois · 1976
  3. People v. OusleyIllinois Supreme Court · 2009
  4. Smith v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1978
  5. People v. OravisAppellate Court of Illinois · 1980

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API