Legal Opinion
United States v. Hively
District Court, E.D. Arkansas
Decided March 4, 2002No. 4:00CR00187(1)PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER REGARDING MOVANTS SANDY DAVIS AND THE ARKANSAS DEMOCRAT-GAZETTE’S JOURNALISTIC PRIVILEGE CLAIM
MOODY, District Judge.
Movants Sandy Davis and the Arkansas DemocraV-Gazette (“NDG”) (collectively, “Movants”) have moved to limit the scope of her testimony in this trial. Ms. Davis has been subpoenaed by the United States as a possible rebuttal witness and by Mr. Hively as a defense witness. The Court conducted a preliminary hearing on this issue on Tuesday, February 19, 2002. 1 At the conclusion of the hearing, Movants’ counsel advised .that if called to testify in this criminal trial, Ms.…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- United States v. NixonSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Branzburg v. HayesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Trammel v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Jaffee v. RedmondSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- United States v. BryanSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Hade v. City of FremontDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2002
- Richardson v. SuggDistrict Court, E.D. Arkansas · 2004