United States v. Wihinier
District Court, W.D. Washington
Proceeding by the United States against T. Wihinier. On motion to suppress.
1Opinion of the Court
NETERER, District Judge.
The motion to suppress, I think, should be denied. The search warrant gives the number, 916 Spruce street, Seattle, Wash., operated and occupied by T. H. Wihinier. The premises searched were occupied by the defendant. The fact that the premises were an apartment house does not invalidate the search of the defendant’s premises as directed by the search warrant, and no other person can complain.1
Cases cited by the United States: Santo v. State, 2 Iowa, 165, 63 Am. Dec. 487, at page 512; State v. L. S. Drew, 38 Vt. 387; State v. McMulty, 7 N. D. 155, 73 N. W. 82; Haywood…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Haywood v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1920
- Santo v. StateSupreme Court of Iowa · 1855
- United States v. RykowskiDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 1920
- United States v. MitchellDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1921
- United States v. AlexanderDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 1922
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- United States v. BarkouskasDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1930
- Walker v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1924
- United States v. LepperDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 1923
- Garner v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1971
- Snedegar v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1925
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.