McNeil v. Yellow Cab Co. of Lancaster & Palmdale
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
COBEY, Acting P. J.
Plaintiff, Chester N. McNeil, appeals, following trial to the court, from a judgment for defendants, Yellow Cab Company of Lancaster and Palmdale and Arthur Calvin Scharf, in his action against them for damages for personal injuries. The appeal lies. (Code Civ. Proc., § 904.1, subd. (a).)
At the conclusion of the first phase of a bifurcated trial (the liability phase, see Code Civ. Proc., § 598), the trial court found that a taxicab, owned by Yellow Cab Company (a corporation), and operated by Scharf, in the course and scope of his employment by Yellow Cab, in which…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- People v. ColeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
- Benson v. Penn Central Transportation Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
- Tiemeyer Ex Rel. Tiemeyer v. McIntoshSupreme Court of Iowa · 1970
- Truman v. VargasCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969
- Mortensen v. Southern Pacific Co.California Court of Appeal · 1966
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Campbell v. General Motors Corp.California Supreme Court · 1982
- General Motors Corp. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996
- Von Beltz v. Stuntman, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1989
- Twohig v. BrinerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
- McKee v. Southeast Delco School DistrictSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.