Legal Opinion

McNeil v. Yellow Cab Co. of Lancaster & Palmdale

California Court of Appeal

Decided September 27, 1978No. Civ. 53110PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

COBEY, Acting P. J.

Plaintiff, Chester N. McNeil, appeals, following trial to the court, from a judgment for defendants, Yellow Cab Company of Lancaster and Palmdale and Arthur Calvin Scharf, in his action against them for damages for personal injuries. The appeal lies. (Code Civ. Proc., § 904.1, subd. (a).)

At the conclusion of the first phase of a bifurcated trial (the liability phase, see Code Civ. Proc., § 598), the trial court found that a taxicab, owned by Yellow Cab Company (a corporation), and operated by Scharf, in the course and scope of his employment by Yellow Cab, in which…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. People v. ColeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
  2. Benson v. Penn Central Transportation Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  3. Tiemeyer Ex Rel. Tiemeyer v. McIntoshSupreme Court of Iowa · 1970
  4. Truman v. VargasCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969
  5. Mortensen v. Southern Pacific Co.California Court of Appeal · 1966

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Campbell v. General Motors Corp.California Supreme Court · 1982
  2. General Motors Corp. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996
  3. Von Beltz v. Stuntman, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1989
  4. Twohig v. BrinerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
  5. McKee v. Southeast Delco School DistrictSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API