Gilchrist v. Helena, H. S. & S. R.
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Montana
In Equity. On exceptions to answer to cross-bill.
1Opinion of the CourtKnowles, J.
One of the defendants in the above-entitled action, the Northwestern Guaranty Loan Company, filed therein its cross-bill asking for affirmative relief against plaintiffs and all the other defendants. The said defendants have answered this bill. A part of them join in one answer, a part in another answer, and John Steadman, J. S. Keerl, and the Helena Steam Heating & Supply Company each in separate answers. In each one of these answers the following allegations are made, to-wit:
“ (1) That the Farmers’ Loan & Trust Company of New York, in said bill mentioned, has not, and at the time the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Ex Parte Crow DogSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
- Cooper Manufacturing Co. v. FergusonSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
- Chew Heong v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
- Dillon v. BarnardSupreme Court of the United States · 1875
- State v. StollSupreme Court of the United States · 1873
3Cited by12 opinions
- Doe v. Springfield Boiler & Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1900
- Commercial Bank v. ShermanOregon Supreme Court · 1896
- Fuller v. AllenSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
- George R. Barse Live Stock Co. v. Range Valley Cattle Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1897
- Ammons v. Brunswick-Balke-Collender Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1905
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.