Legal Opinion

Gilchrist v. Helena, H. S. & S. R.

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Montana

Decided September 14, 1891PublishedCited by 12 opinions

In Equity. On exceptions to answer to cross-bill.

1Opinion of the CourtKnowles, J.

One of the defendants in the above-entitled action, the Northwestern Guaranty Loan Company, filed therein its cross-bill asking for affirmative relief against plaintiffs and all the other defendants. The said defendants have answered this bill. A part of them join in one answer, a part in another answer, and John Steadman, J. S. Keerl, and the Helena Steam Heating & Supply Company each in separate answers. In each one of these answers the following allegations are made, to-wit:

“ (1) That the Farmers’ Loan & Trust Company of New York, in said bill mentioned, has not, and at the time the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Ex Parte Crow DogSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
  2. Cooper Manufacturing Co. v. FergusonSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
  3. Chew Heong v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
  4. Dillon v. BarnardSupreme Court of the United States · 1875
  5. State v. StollSupreme Court of the United States · 1873

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Doe v. Springfield Boiler & Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1900
  2. Commercial Bank v. ShermanOregon Supreme Court · 1896
  3. Fuller v. AllenSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
  4. George R. Barse Live Stock Co. v. Range Valley Cattle Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1897
  5. Ammons v. Brunswick-Balke-Collender Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1905

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API