HILDEBRAND v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
District Court, W.D. Oklahoma
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA RAYMOND HILDEBRAND, et al., ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. ) No. CIV-24-1333-R ) FRANK KENDALL, et al., ) ) Defendants. ) ORDER Before the Court is Defendants Secretary Frank Kendall and United States Defense Department’s Motion to Dismiss [Doc. No. 17]. Plaintiffs Raymond Hildebrand and Taylor Hildebrand responded [Doc. No. 18], and Defendants replied [Doc. No. 19]. The matter is now at issue. For the reasons that follow, Defendants’ Motion is GRANTED. INTRODUCTION During the COVID-19 pandemic, President Joe Biden signed an executive order…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Brown v. General Services AdministrationSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Bennett v. Windstream Communications, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2015
- Ford v. WestCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2000
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.