Legal Opinion

HILDEBRAND v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

District Court, W.D. Oklahoma

Decided June 12, 2025No. 5:24-cv-01333Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA RAYMOND HILDEBRAND, et al., ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. ) No. CIV-24-1333-R ) FRANK KENDALL, et al., ) ) Defendants. ) ORDER Before the Court is Defendants Secretary Frank Kendall and United States Defense Department’s Motion to Dismiss [Doc. No. 17]. Plaintiffs Raymond Hildebrand and Taylor Hildebrand responded [Doc. No. 18], and Defendants replied [Doc. No. 19]. The matter is now at issue. For the reasons that follow, Defendants’ Motion is GRANTED. INTRODUCTION During the COVID-19 pandemic, President Joe Biden signed an executive order…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Brown v. General Services AdministrationSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. Bennett v. Windstream Communications, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2015
  5. Ford v. WestCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2000

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API