Legal Opinion

United States v. Glessing

District Court, D. Minnesota

Decided August 20, 1951No. Cr. No. 8173PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

NORDBYE, Chief Judge.

Defendant is charged by information with failing to submit for induction into the Armed Forces of the United States. A plea of not guilty has been entered. Defendant now proceeds under Rule 15(a), Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, 18 U.S.C.A., for leave to take depositions of the persons referred to above. The affidavit signed by defendant’s counsel in support of the motion states that the testimony of each member of the Presidential Appeal Board “is material and ;it is necessary to take his deposition in order to prevent a failure of justice.” In general language, the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Estep v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  2. Wong Yim v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1941
  3. United States v. HofmannDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1938

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. United States v. ValentineDistrict Court, D. Puerto Rico · 1968
  2. United States v. Dinty Warmington Whiting, James R. Crowe and Walter J. SarnitzCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1962
  3. United States v. SoblenDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1961
  4. United States v. MitchellDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1974
  5. United States v. BronstonDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1971

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API