Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Williams

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 4, 1980No. 801PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WIEAND, Judge:

The only issue properly raised in this appeal is whether the trial court abused its discretion by a determination during trial that four prior robbery convictions would be received to attack appellant’s credibility if he testified. 1 We conclude that it was an abuse of discretion and reverse.

At or about 1:30 o’clock, A.M., on May 17, 1977, Janet and Robert Richards had alighted from their vehicle and were standing in the driveway of their home when they were assaulted and robbed by three black men. Richards was injured while struggling with one of the robbers. Taken from him…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. BighumSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
  2. Commonwealth v. RootsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  3. Commonwealth v. PerrinSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
  4. Commonwealth v. TwiggsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
  5. Commonwealth v. CobbSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1978

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. RandallSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  2. Commonwealth v. RichardsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  3. Commonwealth v. BunchSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  4. Commonwealth v. KearseSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  5. Commonwealth v. GordonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API