Legal Opinion

United States v. James Jackson

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided November 7, 2000No. 99-50302PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

W. FLETCHER, Circuit Judge:

This case presents the question whether, as part of a criminal sentence, a district court may order that undistributed funds from a pension plan covered by the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (“ERISA”) be used to make immediate payment of restitution. We hold that unless the crime involved the ERISA pension plan in question and restitution is ordered to that plan, undistributed funds are not available for such payment.

I

Appellant James Jackson (“Jackson”) was indicted on forty-six counts of embezzling labor union assets, in violation of 29 U.S.C. § 501(c). He…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. United States v. OlanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. Guidry v. Sheet Metal Workers National Pension FundSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  3. Paul A. Wright, on Behalf of All Similarly Situated Persons v. Chase RivelandCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
  4. United States v. Stanley J. GaudetCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1992

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. United States v. Raymond P. NovakCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
  2. United States v. Dennis BrightCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
  3. Estate of Kensinger v. URL Pharma, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2012
  4. United States v. RiceDistrict Court, N.D. Oklahoma · 2002
  5. United States v. Bernard Jaffe, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2005

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API