Shepard and Associates, Inc. v. Lokring Technology, LLC
District Court, N.D. Ohio
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION SHEPARD AND ASSOCIATES, ) CASE NO. 1:20-cv-02488 INC., et al., ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) JUDGE BRIDGET MEEHAN BRENNAN v. ) ) LOKRING TECHNOLOGY, LLC, ) ) MEMORANDUM OPINION Defendant/Third-Party Plaintiff, ) AND ORDER ) v. ) ) TUBE-MAC INDUSTRIES, INC., ) ) Third-Party Defendant. ) Before the Court is Third-Party Defendant Tube-Mac Industries, Inc.’s Motion for Attorney’s Fees and Costs. (Doc. No. 427.)1 Third-Party Plaintiff Lokring Technology, Inc., opposed the motion (Doc. 440), and Tube-Mac replied in support (Doc. No. 441).…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Link v. Wabash RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Chambers v. Nasco, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Alyeska Pipeline Service Co. v. Wilderness SocietySupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Octane Fitness, LLC v. Icon HealthSupreme Court of the United States · 2014
- Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co. v. HaegerSupreme Court of the United States · 2017
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.