Legal Opinion
Hampsmire v. City of Santa Cruz
District Court, N.D. California
Decided September 28, 2012No. Case No. 11-cv-3408 RMWPublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART MOTIONS FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT
RONALD M. WHYTE, District Judge.
This civil rights action arises from the arrest of plaintiff William Hampsmire (“plaintiff’) for disturbing the peace while preaching on a public sidewalk in Santa Cruz, California. Plaintiff and defendants the City of Santa Cruz (the “City”), Officer Kevin Vogel, Officer Patrick Bayani and Officer Chris Vigil (the “Officer Defendants”) (collectively “Defendants”) have filed cross-motions for partial summary judgment. For the reasons below, the *927court: (1) grants plaintiffs motion as…
2Cases cited52 opinions
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Rizzo v. GoodeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Devaney v. KilmartinDistrict Court, D. Rhode Island · 2015
- McClellan v. City of AlexandriaDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2019
- Harman v. City of Santa CruzDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2017
- Abolish Abortion Oregon v. City of Grants PassDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2022