Legal Opinion

Stahl v. Exxon Corp.

District Court, S.D. Texas

Decided July 1, 2002No. CIV.A. H-99-3029PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

CRONE, United States Magistrate Judge.

Pending before the court is Defendant ExxonMobil Corporation, formerly known as Exxon Corporation ( Exxon”), and Defendant ExxonMobil Pension Plan’s, formerly known as Exxon Annuity Plan (“the Plan”), motion for summary judgment (# 30). In this action, Plaintiff Beverly Ann Robertson, formerly Beverly Ann Stahl (“Beverly”), claims she is entitled to one-half the proceeds of a Surviving Spouse Annuity (“SSA”) following the death of her former husband, Andrew Jackson Stahl (“Andrew”). In response, Exxon and the Plan claim that Andrew’s…

2Cases cited76 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
  5. Paul W. Douglass v. United Services Automobile AssociationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1996

71 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Jackson v. Central States, Southeast and Southwest Areas Pension FundDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API