Legal Opinion

McMaster v. Pung

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided January 29, 1993No. 92-1625PublishedCited by 40 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McMILLIAN, Circuit Judge.

Gregory J. McMaster appeals from a final order entered in the District Court1 for the District of Minnesota granting summary judgment in favor of Minnesota Department of Corrections officials in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 civil rights action. McMaster v. Pung, No. 4-91-236 (D.Minn. Feb. 24, 1992) (order). Appellant alleged violations of his constitutional rights to due process, assistance of counsel and access to the courts. The district court found that no genuine issue of material fact existed because none of appellant’s due process or Sixth Amendment rights were violated…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Wolff v. McDonnellSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. Bounds v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  3. Johnson v. AverySupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  4. Sands v. LewisCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
  5. Peterkin v. JeffesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1988

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by40 opinions

  1. Temujin Kensu v. Allen C. Haigh Tom Bell Yvonne Murzen Sandy Grant Linda HayesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1996
  2. Robert Dale Strickler v. Gary Waters, Sheriff Commonwealth of Virginia City of Portsmouth Department of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1993
  3. Hamm v. GrooseCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1994
  4. Hershberger v. ScalettaCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1994
  5. McMaster v. State of Minn.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1993

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API