Robert Johnson v. G.D.F., Incorpora
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
TINDER, Circuit Judge.
When a prevailing party is entitled to “a reasonable attorney’s fee,” see, e.g., 42 U.S.C. § 1988; 29 U.S.C. § 216(b), the district court must make that assessment, at least initially, based on a calculation of the “lodestar” — the hours reasonably expended multiplied by the reasonable hourly rate — and nothing else. See Pickett v. Sheridan Health Care, 664 F.3d 632, 640-43 (7th Cir.2011). In limited circumstances, once calculated, the lodestar amount may be adjusted. See Perdue v. Kenny A. ex rel. Winn, — U.S. -, 130 S.Ct. 1662, 1673-74, 176 L.Ed.2d 494 (2010); Hensley…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Perdue v. Kenny A. ex rel. WinnSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
- Kenneth Spegon v. The Catholic Bishop of ChicagoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1999
- Pickett v. Sheridan Health Care CenterCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2011
- Brian Uphoff and David Damon, Individually and on Behalf of a Class of Employees v. Elegant Bath, Ltd., Chuck Does It All, Inc., and Charles L. CrosbyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1999
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by82 opinions
- Andy Montanez v. Joseph SimonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2014
- Sommerfield v. City of ChicagoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2017
- Lee v. Krystal Co.District Court, S.D. Alabama · 2013
- Bratton v. Thomas Law Firm, PCDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 2013
- Shales v. T. Manning Concrete, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2012
77 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.