Williams v. State

TAYLOR, Chief Justice.

Appellant claims that homeowner’s insurance which covered some of his victims’ losses should reheve him of the restitution obligation as described by his plea agreement and reiterated in the district court’s judgment and sentence. Uninterested in rewarding a confessed burglar for the foresight of his victims in maintaining insurance coverage, and even less intrigued by the notion of allowing a felon to profit from his criminal enterprise, we affirm.

I. ISSUES

Appellant, Farrel Kasey Williams (Williams), states two issues:

ISSUE I

Did the trial court err when it declared the…