Holterman v. Holterman
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the CourtMugglin, J.
Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court (Cannizzaro, J.), ordering, inter alia, equitable distribution of the parties’ marital property, entered October 25, 2002 in Albany County, upon a decision of the court.
On this appeal defendant claims error with the monetary aspects of equitable distribution, maintenance, child support, life insurance and fees. First, defendant claims that the rationale in Brough v Brough (285 AD2d 913 [2001]) should be applied here and plaintiffs share of that portion of his enhanced earnings that is marital property should be limited to 10%. We disagree. Although…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Hartog v. HartogNew York Court of Appeals · 1995
- McSparron v. McSparronNew York Court of Appeals · 1995
- Grunfeld v. GrunfeldNew York Court of Appeals · 2000
- Vicinanzo v. VicinanzoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
- Brough v. BroughAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Chiotti v. ChiottiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
- Litvak v. LitvakAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
- Ndulo v. NduloAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
- Brzuszkiewicz v. BrzuszkiewiczAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
- Blay v. BlayAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.