Legal Opinion

Engelking v. Boyce

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided May 3, 1977No. 410-862, SC 24679PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

O’CONNELL, J.,

Pro Tempore.

This is an action to recover damages for breach of contract brought against defendant real estate broker. Based upon evidence in the record of previous litigation between the same parties and involving the same transaction, 1 the trial court found that defendant had performed the contract and therefore allowed defendant’s motion for summary judgment. Plaintiffs appeal.

The evidence establishes that in December 1970 defendant sold a parcel of real property to plaintiffs and as a part of the transaction defendant agreed that if within six months plaintiffs notified…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Setser v. Commonwealth, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1970
  2. Pelege v. ChryslerOregon Supreme Court · 1977
  3. Engelking v. FieldOregon Supreme Court · 1974

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Rancosky v. Washington National Ins. Co., Aplt.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
  2. Stanfield v. LaccoarceOregon Supreme Court · 1980
  3. Duyck v. Northwest Chemical Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1988
  4. Millspaugh v. Port of PortlandCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1983
  5. Bishop v. WatersCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2016

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API