King v. United States
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
NEBEKER, Associate Judge:
These appeals arise from convictions of attempted burglary in.the second degree, 1 destroying private property, 2 and petit larceny. 3 In No. 5335 the accused urges error in permitting intra-trial amendment of the information to reflect true ownership of the property in question; that a piece of copper pipe used as evidence was not shown to have been part of the copper pipe taken from the property; and that consecutive sentences for the three offenses totaling two and one-half years 4 are not permitted because the burglary statute prescribes a two-year minimum, and
“ *…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Smith v. PollinCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1952
- Roy Irby v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1967
- Daniel Smith, Jr. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1960
- United States v. Roy D. LewisCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1970
- Sams v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1969
3Cited by20 opinions
- Taylor v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1992
- Bell v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1996
- Smith v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1980
- Shanahan v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1976
- Allen v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1978
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.