Legal Opinion
In re Champlain Parkway Act 250 Permit (Fortieth Burlington LLC, Appellant)
Supreme Court of Vermont
Decided August 21, 2015No. 2014-352PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
¶ 1.
Skoglund, J.
The City of Burlington and the Vermont Agency of Transportation (AOT) applied for an Act 250 permit amendment to complete a project known as the Champlain Parkway, a roadway designed to route traffic more efficiently from Interstate 89 in South Burlington to the City of Burlington’s downtown area. The environmental court concluded that the application complied with Act 250’s transportation criterion (Criterion 5) subject to conditions requiring that applicants monitor and report on the project’s traffic-congestion and safety impacts, and work with the opposing party in this…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- In Re Eastview at Middlebury, Inc.Supreme Court of Vermont · 2010
- In Re Village Associates Act 250 Land Use PermitSupreme Court of Vermont · 2010
- State v. BakerSupreme Court of Vermont · 1990
- In re Goddard College Conditional Use, Goddard College Act 250 ReconsiderationSupreme Court of Vermont · 2014
3Cited by16 opinions
- In re Costco Stormwater Dishcharge Permit, Costco Final Plat & Site Plan, Costco Act 250 Land Use Permit, Wetlands, Reclassification (R.L. Vallee, Inc. and Timberlake Associates LLP, Appellants)Supreme Court of Vermont · 2016
- In re North East Materials Group, LLC/Rock of Ages Corp. Act 250 Permit (Russell Austin, Pamela Austin, Julie Barre, Marc Bernier, Collectively, Neighbors for Healthy Communities, Appellants)Supreme Court of Vermont · 2019
- In re Treetop Development Company Act 250 Development (Treetop at Stratton Condominium Assn., Inc., Appellant)Supreme Court of Vermont · 2016
- In Re Katzenbach A250 Permit 7R1374-1 (Christian Katzenbach & Clark Katzenbach, Appellants)Supreme Court of Vermont · 2022
- In re Hinesburg Hannaford Act 250 PermitSupreme Court of Vermont · 2017
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.