Legal Opinion

Higginbotham v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided April 11, 1996No. 2-94-285-CRPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MILLER, Justice, sitting by assignment.

Appellant Clifton Howard Higginbotham was indicted for the offense of burglary of a building, enhanced by two prior convictions. After a trial by jury on a not guilty plea, he was found guilty and, after pleading true to both enhancement paragraphs, was assessed a punishment by the jury of forty years in the Institutional Division of the Texas Department of Criminal Justice. On appeal, Higginbotham brings two points of error complaining that the evidence is insufficient and that reversible error occurred when an extraneous offense was admitted. We…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  3. Thompson v. City of LouisvilleSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
  4. Butler v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1989
  5. Rogers v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1993

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. King v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2006
  2. State v. RenteriaCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1998
  3. Krystal Rena King v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2006
  4. Krystal Rena King v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2006
  5. State v. RenteriaCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API