Pacific Coast Casualty Co. v. Pillsbury
California Supreme Court
APPLICATION originally made in the Supreme Court for a Writ of Review against the members of the industrial accident commission to review its findings allowing compensation to an employee for disability. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. T. T. C. Gregory, D. Hadsell, and J. G. Sweet, for Petitioner.
1Opinion of the CourtAngellotti, C. J.
In view of what is shown by the petition and accompanying exhibits, the only matters upon which it might reasonably be urged that petitioner was entitled to a hearing in the courts are: 1. That the employee has been allowed compensation for a longer period than that of actual disability; and, 2. That in making the award the commission failed to credit the employer with the sum of twenty-five dollars paid by him to the employee. Even if we assume that findings of the commission in such matters as these are reviewable by the courts, it still remains that no case is here made authorizing any…
2Cited by3 opinions
- Alford v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
- Pullman Co. v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
- County of Los Angeles v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930