Legal Opinion
Trapnell v. Smith
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Decided March 13, 1974No. 48526PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Stolz, Judge.
1. A most cursory examination of the record in this case reveals that the original proceedings to declare Mrs. Gertrude Trapnell incompetent and for the appointment of a guardian of her person and property were instituted and carried out under the authority of former Code Ann. Ch. 88-5, based upon Ga. L. 1964, pp. 499, 531-545; 1965, pp. 490, 491; 1967, p. 763; 1968, pp. 333, 334, which has been repealed and superseded by Ga. L. 1969, p. 505 et seq. (Code Ann. Ch. 88-5).
An examination of the record does not reveal that notice of the hearing was served on the patient, Mrs.…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Templeman v. JeffriesSupreme Court of Georgia · 1931
- Morton v. SimsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1879
- Boockholdt v. BrownSupreme Court of Georgia · 1968
- Milam v. TerrellSupreme Court of Georgia · 1958
- Troutman v. TroutmanCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1968
3Cited by5 opinions
- Johnson v. United StatesDistrict Court, M.D. Florida · 1976
- Jordan v. Ford Motor Credit Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1977
- Safe-Lite Manufacturing, Inc. v. C. E. Morgan Building Products, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1979
- Ray v. Tattnall BankCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1983
- Trapnell v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1974