Legal Opinion
Carnal v. Dan Coleman, Inc.
Colorado Court of Appeals
Decided September 4, 1986No. 85CA0521PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
STERNBERG, Judge.
Dan Coleman, Inc., and Ruan Transport Corporation bring this ex parte appeal from the judgment of the trial court denying their request for attorney fees against Harold R. Carnal, who appeared as plaintiff at trial. We reverse.
On July 24, 1984, Carnal brought an action seeking damages against these defendants on various claims. He alleged damage to his automobile caused by the negligence of both Coleman and Ruan, and also, in a separate claim, alleged breach of a health insurance agreement. Carnal, a former employee of Coleman, sought damages against Coleman alone pursuant to…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Hartman v. FreedmanSupreme Court of Colorado · 1979
- International Technical Instruments, Inc. v. Engineering Measurements Co.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1983
- Alessi v. HogueColorado Court of Appeals · 1984
- Keeton v. RikeColorado Court of Appeals · 1977
3Cited by6 opinions
- Technical Computer Services, Inc. v. BuckleyColorado Court of Appeals · 1992
- Levy-Wegrzyn v. EdigerColorado Court of Appeals · 1994
- Township Homeowners Ass'n v. Arapahoe Roofing & Sheet Metal Co.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1992
- Colorado Department of Social Services v. Bethesda Care Center, Inc.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1993
- Montrose Valley Funeral Home, Inc. v. CrippinColorado Court of Appeals · 1992
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.