Legal Opinion

State v. Hinton

Washington Supreme Court

Decided February 27, 2014No. 87663-1Published

1Opinion of the Court

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON STATE OF WASHINGTON, ) ) Respondent, ) No. 87663-1 ) v. ) EnBanc ) SHAWN DANIEL HINTON, ) ) Appellant. ) Filed FEB 2 7 2014 ________________________ ) GONZALEZ, J.-We consider whether a text message conversation was "a private affair[ ]" protected from a warrantless search by article I, section 7 of our state constitution. A police detective read text messages on a cell phone police seized from Daniel Lee, who had been arrested for possession of heroin. Among other things, the detective read an incoming text message from Shawn Hinton, responded…

2Cases cited72 opinions

  1. Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Olmstead v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
  3. Hoffa v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  4. United States v. SalvucciSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  5. United States v. JonesSupreme Court of the United States · 2012

67 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API