Legal Opinion

Ingram v. Madison Square Garden Center, Inc.

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided December 13, 1979No. 76 CIV 5870 (LBS), 78 CIV 1453 (LBS)PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

SAND, District Judge.

On October 3, 1979, this Court held that the manner in which Local # 3, International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers (“Local 3”) referred workers to Madison Square Garden (“the Garden”) for employment as “laborers” violated both Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq. (1970) and the Civil Rights Act of 1866, 42 U.S.C. § 1981 (1970). 1 The Court found that the plaintiffs in the first of these two consolidated class actions, 2 the “Ingram” plaintiffs, were entitled to recover under § 1981 only, while plaintiffs in the second action,…

2Cases cited41 opinions

  1. International Brotherhood of Teamsters v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  2. Albemarle Paper Co. v. MoodySupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  3. Christiansburg Garment Co. v. Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  4. Johnson v. Railway Express Agency, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1975
  5. Franks v. Bowman Transportation Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Williamsburg Fair Housing Committee v. Ross-Rodney Housing Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1984
  2. Rasimas v. Michigan Department of Mental HealthCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1983
  3. Ingram v. Madison Square Garden Center, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1983
  4. Anderson v. Local Union No. 3, International Brotherhood of Electrical WorkersDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1984
  5. United States v. Yonkers Board of EducationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1987

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API