Legal Opinion

Keena v. Scales

California Supreme Court

Decided August 31, 1964No. S. F. No. 21560PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPeek, J.

Plaintiff appeals from a judgment for defendant in an action for personal injuries arising out of a fall from a chair on which plaintiff sat while conducting a business transaction in defendant’s office.

The sole issue presented on this appeal is whether the trial court committed prejudicial error in failing to give plaintiff’s proffered instruction on the doctrine of res ipsa loquitur.

Defendant made certain repairs to plaintiff’s automobile, and the parties entered defendant’s office for the purpose of drawing up the repair bill. Plaintiff sat on a swivel chair in *781front of defendant’s desk…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Seneris v. HaasCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
  2. Zentz v. Coca Cola Bottling Co.California Supreme Court · 1952
  3. Seffert v. Los Angeles Transit LinesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
  4. Rose v. Melody LaneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
  5. Di Mare v. CresciCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Walbrook Insurance v. Liberty Mutual InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992
  2. Diamond Springs Lime Co. v. American River ConstructorsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1971
  3. Seeley v. CombsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1966
  4. Sweet v. SwangelSupreme Court of Iowa · 1969
  5. Cordova v. FordCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API