Legal Opinion
United States v. Michael Owen Brannan
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided March 12, 1990No. 89-50016PublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GOODWIN, Chief Judge:
Michael Owen Brannan appeals his conviction following a jury trial for use of a counterfeit access device, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1029(a)(1). On appeal Brannan challenges the district court’s denial of his pre-trial motion to suppress evidence seized from his home by United States Secret Service agents and the adequacy of the government’s proof that he used “counterfeit access devices” within the meaning of 18 U.S.C. § 1029(a)(1). We affirm.
For three years before his arrest in April, 1988, Brannan obtained and used numerous credit cards in names other than his own.…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- United States v. MatlockSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- United States v. Mohammad Reza MehrmaneshCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
- United States v. YarbroughCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
- UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Robert MURRAY, James Moore, and Susan Watson, Defendants-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
- United States v. Russell Floyd LongCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1975
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- United States v. Daniel Joe ChischillyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
- United States v. Darryl Freeman, Tyrone NettersCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
- United States v. Allen Perry Soape, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1999
- Moore v. AndrenoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2007
- United States v. McFallCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.