Legal Opinion

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Robert MURRAY, James Moore, and Susan Watson, Defendants-Appellants

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided January 22, 1985No. 83-1253 to 83-1255PublishedCited by 67 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HUG, Circuit Judge:

Pursuant to the second superseding indictment filed June 10, 1983, defendants Robert A. Murray (“Murray”), Susan Watson (“Watson”), and James A. Moore (“Moore”) were charged with conspiracy to conceal assets in bankruptcy, in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 371, 152 (1982) (“Count I”). Murray and Moore were individually charged with knowingly and fraudulently transferring and concealing assets from a trustee in bankruptcy to defraud creditors, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 152 (“Count II, Count III, and Count IV”). Murray was also indicted for destroying documents pertaining to the…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Coolidge v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. Payton v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  4. Texas v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  5. United States v. Procter & Gamble Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1958

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by67 opinions

  1. United States v. Murad NersesianCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1987
  2. Alcala v. WoodfordCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
  3. United States v. Victor Montano DislaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
  4. United States v. David SilvermanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
  5. Kim Moss v. Gerald HofbauerCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2002

62 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API