Anderson-Tully Co. v. Thompson
Tennessee Supreme Court
FROM SHELBY. In Anderson-Tully v. Thompson: Appeal from the Chancery Court of Shelby county. —P. H. Heiskell, Judge. In State, ex rel. v. Tate: Appeal from the Probate Court of Shelby County.— J. S. Galloway, Judge.
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Fancher
The question presented in each of these cases, which were tried together, is whether or not the chancery court had jurisdiction to enjoin the defendants E. D., J. M., and Frank Thompson from interfering with complainants Anderson-Tully Company, their agents, *82servants, and employees, from removing timber cut from certain .lands in the State of Arkansas. The Anderson-Tully Company had conveyed to defendants these lands, reserving the right to cut and remove the merchantable timber therefrom until January 1, 1914.
It- was charged that the Thompsons, for the purposé of delaying the cutting and…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Pennoyer v. NeffSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Massie v. WattsSupreme Court of the United States · 1810
- Watkins v. Lessee of HolmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1842
- Mississippi & Missouri Railroad v. WardSupreme Court of the United States · 1863
- Northern Indiana Railroad Co. v. MICHIGAN CENT. RD. CO.Supreme Court of the United States · 1854
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Martin v. MartinCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1988
- United States Gypsum Co. v. American Surety Co.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1931